How to Spot Quality Meat Cuts Every Time
- Maree O'Connor
- Jul 17
- 2 min read

Quality meat is the cornerstone of any great dish, and for chefs and venue managers, recognising a top-tier cut on sight (and touch) can save time, reduce waste, and guarantee consistency in every service. But in a fast-moving kitchen, you need more than just a visual cue — you need to know what defines excellence in beef, pork, lamb and chicken.
At à La Carte Meats, we work closely with chefs to deliver proteins that exceed expectations, and that starts with education. For example, high-quality beef should have even marbling — those small, white flecks of intramuscular fat that deliver tenderness and flavour. Pork should appear firm and moist, with a natural pink hue, while lamb should be fine-grained, with a pale to medium red colour. Chicken, often overlooked in terms of quality, should have a supple texture and appear fresh and unprocessed, with no excessive water weight.
But quality goes beyond appearance. It’s about how the animal was raised, how the meat was aged or rested, and whether it’s been expertly butchered.
Cuts should be symmetrical, neatly trimmed, and appropriately portioned to suit the dish they’re intended for. Subtle details, like consistent fat caps or proper muscle direction, can have a big impact on how the meat cooks and presents.
Chefs should also be aware of the practical signs of meat mishandling or poor-quality processing.
Is the cut too wet, indicating excess water retention or improper storage?
Is there a strong smell that could signal age or bacterial growth?
Is the colour uniform, or are there dark patches from bruising or oxidation?
Your best tool for maintaining quality is a reliable supplier who understands your kitchen’s standards. At à La Carte Meats, we not only select premium livestock but also oversee the processing to ensure our cuts arrive ready for action.
When you have a partner that prioritises quality at every stage — from farm to delivery — you can focus on building great food, not managing inconsistency.








